Skip to content

SEO Meta Tag Auditor

Example prompt: "I'll keep a list of our most important pages in a Google Sheet tab called 'Pages'. Once a month, fetch each URL, pull the current title and meta description, score them against our guidelines (titles 50-60 characters, descriptions 140-160 characters, primary keyword present, no duplicate titles across the list), and write the score plus a suggested rewrite into the same row. Post a Slack summary in #seo with the count of pages needing attention."

How to automate SEO meta tag audits with GloriaMundo

The Problem

Title tags and meta descriptions decay quietly. A page gets shipped with good metadata, then the content gets edited, the title gets duplicated when someone copies the template, the description gets truncated, the primary keyword drifts. Across a content library of even a few hundred pages, manually auditing this every quarter means opening each URL, copying the metadata into a spreadsheet, counting characters, checking for duplicates, and writing rewrites where needed. It is the kind of work that gets skipped until traffic starts dropping.

How GloriaMundo Solves It

We build a workflow that reads your page list from Google Sheets, fetches each URL in turn, extracts the current <title> and <meta name="description"> values, and scores them against the rules you set. An LLM step writes a short rewrite suggestion for any page that fails one of the checks — too short, too long, missing keyword, duplicated across the list. The results are written back to the sheet with a status column and a suggestion column, so your team can act on the worst offenders first. Glass Box preview shows you the planned per-page checks and the column writes before the workflow touches the sheet, and you can run it on a fixed schedule or on demand.

Example Workflow Steps

  1. Trigger (scheduled): First of the month, or on-demand.
  2. Step 1 (Integration): Read the 'Pages' tab of the target Google Sheet to get the list of URLs.
  3. Step 2 (URL extract, foreach): For each URL, fetch the page and pull the title tag and meta description.
  4. Step 3 (Code): Score each page: title length, description length, primary keyword present, duplicate-title check across the full list.
  5. Step 4 (LLM): For pages that failed one or more checks, draft a suggested title and description that fix the failures while preserving intent.
  6. Step 5 (Integration): Write the score, the failing checks, and the suggested rewrite back to the matching row in the sheet.
  7. Step 6 (Integration): Post a summary message in Slack with the count of pages needing attention and a link back to the sheet.

Integrations Used

  • Google Sheets — the source of the page list and the destination for the audit results
  • Slack — receives the run summary so the SEO owner knows when an audit has finished

Who This Is For

SEO managers and content leads who own a library of 50 to a few thousand pages and want a recurring quality check on title and description metadata without paying for a full-fledged SEO platform per seat.

Time & Cost Saved

Manually auditing 100 pages typically takes 4-6 hours: opening each, recording the metadata, counting characters, checking for duplicates, drafting rewrites. This workflow reduces that to roughly 20 minutes of review on the resulting sheet. Running monthly saves 4-6 hours every cycle, with URL extract and LLM credits well within a normal monthly allowance. The bigger saving is that the audit actually happens, instead of slipping to "next quarter".